Showing posts with label John Calvin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Calvin. Show all posts

John Calvin on Christ in All of Scripture

Sacrifice of Isaac - Rembrandt (1635)

John Calvin, writing in the preface to Pierre-Robert Olivétan’s 1535 translation of the New Testament.
He [Christ] is Isaac, the beloved Son of the Father who was offered as a sacrifice, but nevertheless did not succumb to the power of death.
He is Jacob the watchful shepherd, who has such great care for the sheep which he guards.
He is the good and compassionate brother Joseph, who in his glory was not ashamed to acknowledge his brothers, however lowly and abject their condition.
He is the great sacrificer and bishop Melchizedek, who has offered an eternal sacrifice once for all.
He is the sovereign lawgiver Moses, writing his law on the tables of our hearts by his Spirit.
He is the faithful captain and guide Joshua, to lead us to the Promised Land.
He is the victorious and noble king David, bringing by his hand all rebellious power to subjection.
He is the magnificent and triumphant king Solomon, governing his kingdom in peace and prosperity.
He is the strong and powerful Samson, who by his death has overwhelmed all his enemies.
This is what we should in short seek in the whole of Scripture: truly to know Jesus Christ, and the infinite riches that are comprised in him and are offered to us by him from God the Father. If one were to sift thoroughly the Law and the Prophets, he would not find a single word which would not draw and bring us to him. . . . Therefore, rightly does Saint Paul say in another passage that he would know nothing except Jesus Christ, and him crucified.
HT: Tim Keller, via John Starke and Justin Taylor 

John Calvin on Spiritual Warfare

All that Scripture teaches concerning devils aims at arousing us to take precaution against their stratagems and contrivances, and also to make us equip ourselves with those weapons which are strong and powerful enough to vanquish these most powerful foes.

For when Satan is called the god [II Cor. 4:4] and prince [John 12:31] of this world, when he is spoken of as a strong armed man [Luke 11:21; cf. Matt. 12:29], the spirit who holds power over the air [Eph. 2:2], a roaring lion [I Peter 5:8], these descriptions serve only to make us more cautious and watchful, and thus more prepared to take up the struggle.


This also sometimes is noted explicitly: for Peter, after he has said that the devil "prowls around like a roaring lion seeking someone to devour" [I Peter 5:8], immediately subjoins the exhortation that with faith we steadfastly resist him [I Peter 5:9]. And Paul, after he has warned us that our struggle is not with flesh and blood, but with the princes of the air, with the powers of darkness, and spiritual wickedness [Eph. 6:12], forthwith bids us put on that armor capable of sustaining so great and dangerous a contest [Eph. 6:13ff].


We have been forewarned that an enemy relentlessly threatens us, an enemy who is the very embodiment of rash boldness, of military prowess, of crafty wiles, of untiring zeal and haste, of every conceivable weapon and of skill in the science of warfare.
We must, then, bend our every effort to this goal: that we should not let ourselves be overwhelmed by carelessness or faintheartedness, but on the contrary, with courage rekindled stand our ground in combat. Since this military service ends only at death, let us urge ourselves to perseverance.

Indeed, conscious of our weakness and ignorance, let us especially call upon God's help, relying upon him alone in whatever we attempt, since it is he alone who can supply us with counsel and strength, courage and armor.

--John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, 1.15.13. (Philadelphia: Westminster John Knox Press, 2011 edition), pp. 172-173. 

A Double Grace: John Calvin on Justification and Sanctification

John Calvin, the sixteenth-century Reformer of Geneva, is probably talked about more often than he is read. This is unfortunate. Christian readers who are willing to risk his Institutes of the Christian Religion will discover a treasury of Christ-centered theology that is precise in exegesis and lyrical in expression.

Calvin may be at his most helpful in Book III of the Institutes, on “The Way We Receive the Grace of Christ.” I have benefited much from Calvin’s reflections on grace and salvation. Here is a powerful summary statement:

Christ was given to us by God’s generosity, to be grasped and possessed by us in faith. By partaking of him, we principally receive a double grace: namely, that being reconciled to God through Christ’s blamelessness, we may have in heaven instead of a Judge a gracious Father; and secondly, that sanctified by Christ’s spirit we may cultivate blamelessness and purity of life.[i]

Grasping Christ by faith, we receive a “double grace.” We receive justification and sanctification.

Justification: Reconciled through Christ’s Blamelessness

When we grasp Jesus with the hand of faith, we are “reconciled to God through Christ’s blamelessness.” This is clearly Calvin’s meaning, for he goes on to say:

Justified by faith is he who, excluded from the righteousness of works, grasps the righteousness of Christ through faith, and clothed in it, appears in God’s sight not as a sinner but as a righteous man. Therefore, we explain justification simply as the acceptance with which God receives us into his favor as righteous men. And we say that it consists in the remission of sins and the imputation of Christ’s righteousness.[ii]

Calvin’s definition is squarely rooted in Paul’s declaration from 2 Corinthians.

All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, God making his appeal through us. We implore you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God. For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God. (2 Cor. 5:18-21, ESV)

The only means of reconciliation with God is in the doing and dying of Jesus on our behalf. He lived the life we should have lived and died the death we should have died. God treated Jesus like a sinner, so he could treat us like Jesus.

The Father accepts us as righteous before Him not because of anything we do, and not even because of anything He has done in us, but solely because of what Jesus Christ has done for us.

Sanctification: The Cultivation of a Blameless Life

But there’s more. In Christ we receive a double grace. We are not only “reconciled through Christ’s blamelessness,” we are also “sanctified by Christ’s spirit [that] we may cultivate blamelessness and purity of life.” Justification is joined with sanctification.

Calvin’s preferred term for sanctification was “repentance.”

Repentance can thus well be defined: it is the true turning of our life to God, a turning that arises from a pure and earnest fear of him; and it consists in the mortification of our flesh and of the old man, and in the vivification of the Spirit.[iii]

Don’t let the words “mortification” and “vivification” discourage you! Calvin was simply pointing out the negative and positive dimensions to sanctified Christian living. Mortification is putting sin to death. Vivification is living to righteousness by the power of the Spirit.

In the language of Scripture,

So you also must consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus. Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal bodies, to make you obey their passions. Do not present your members to sin as instruments for unrighteousness, but present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life, and your members to God as instruments for righteousness. (Rom. 6:11-13, ESV)

Die to sin and live to Christ!

Distinct, yet Inseparable

Justification and sanctification are distinct. Yet they cannot be separated. Each depends on God’s free grace, flowing to us from the saving work of Christ on our behalf. Both blessings are integral to salvation and are experienced by all Christians. You cannot have one without the other.

In Calvin’s words:

Since faith embraces Christ, as offered to us by the Father [cf. John 6:29] – that is, since he is offered not only for righteousness, forgiveness of sins, and peace, but also for sanctification [cf. 1 Cor. 1:30] and the fountain of the water of life [John 7:38; cf. ch. 4:14] – without a doubt, no one can duly know him without at the same time apprehending the sanctification of the Spirit. Or, if anyone desires some plainer statement, faith rests upon the knowledge of Christ. And Christ cannot be known apart from the sanctification of his Spirit. It follows that faith can in no wise be separated from a devout disposition.[iv]

Simply put, you can’t take Jesus in slices. If you receive him as a justifying Savior, you must also receive him as a sanctifying Lord. Justification and sanctification belong together.

But there are important distinctions to make. The two are joined, but they are not the same.

* Justification is an event, while sanctification is a process.

* Justification is a legal transaction in which God, as our Divine Judge declares us righteous before him – absolved of all guilt, and counted in the right in his divine tribunal. Sanctification is an internal work of God’s Spirit in which our hearts are changed, cleansed, and purified.

* Justification affects our status, changing our standing before God. For Christ’s sake, we are accepted, considered righteous, even though we are not. Justification is something God does for us. Sanctification affects our hearts, changing our inner being, our nature. By Christ’s Spirit, our hearts are cleansed, made new, and transformed, so that we begin to look more and more like Jesus. Sanctification is something God does in us.

* Justification is God’s work alone. Nothing we have done or can do contributes to it in the least. Sanctification is God’s work, as well. But we must cooperate with him. Our responses and choices can either accelerate or impede the progress of our growth in holiness.

* All believers are justified and no one is more or less justified than any other. All stand before God solely by the perfect obedience of Christ. All believers are being sanctified. But the degree of holiness varies in person to person.

Double Grace, Double Cure

Justification and sanctification – the double grace God gives us through Christ. Or in the words of Augustus Toplady:

Rock of Ages, cleft for me, Let me hide myself in Thee; Let the water and the blood, From thy wounded side which flowed, Be of sin the double cure, Save from wrath and make me pure.[v]

End Notes

[i] John Calvin, John T. McNeil, ed., Institutes of the Christian Religion (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1960) III.xi.1, p. 725.
[ii] Ibid., III.xi.2, p. 726-7.
[iii] Ibid., III.iii.5, p. 597.
[iv] Ibid., III.ii.8 (p. 552-3)
[v] Augustus M. Toplady, “Rock of Ages,” 1776.

The Expository Discipline of John Calvin

Expository preaching takes discipline. It is hard work to do careful exegesis of the next passage and craft a fresh, well-balanced message that is both biblically faithful and culturally relevant, with clear explanation of the text, engaging and colorful illustrations, and thoughtful application to the lives of our people.

Sunday mornings come back around with relentless speed and the preparation of a solid expositional message, sometimes demanding 10-12 hours, is sometimes an arduous, even overwhelming task.

I, for one, need models, if I am to persevere in this expository discipline.

And John Calvin (despite all of his flaws) is a good model.

Calvin left a legacy of Biblical preaching that few since have rivaled. For example, he began preaching through the book of Acts on August 25, 1549, and ended in March of 1554 – nearly five years later! The seriousness of Calvin’s expository discipline is evident in the fact that when he returned to his congregation in Geneva in 1541, after three years of exile, he said nothing of the intervening years to his people. No, he simply picked up his preaching at the verse he had left off three years before!

Calvin summarized the heart of the expositor well when he said,  

“Let us not take it into our heads . . . to seek out God anywhere else than in his Sacred Word, or to think anything about him that is not prompted by his Word, or to speak anything that is not taken from that Word.”[1]

He preached 46 sermons on the Thessalonian letters, 186 on the Corinthians, 86 on the Pastorals, 43 on Galatians, 48 on Ephesians, 159 on Job, 200 on Deuteronomy, 123 on Genesis, and 353 on Isaiah! When he died, Calvin left behind 96 books, 35 volumes of letters, and 2000 sermons.[2]

Not all congregations (or pastors) could readily digest such strong meat today – 353 sermons on Isaiah might not be a good immediate goal for many of us – but Calvin’s faithfulness – in spite of suffering and persecution – should inspire within us a similar steadfastness in our own contexts. As the Apostle Paul charged Timothy, we are to “preach the word . . . in season and out of season.” Those long hours in the study over the next passage for yet one more Sunday is one of the best gifts we can give our people.

Calvin said,

“Let the pastors boldly dare all things by the word of God, of which they are constituted administrators. Let them constrain all the power, glory, and excellence of the world to give place to and to obey the divine majesty of this word. Let them enjoin everyone by it, from the highest to the lowest. Let them edify the body of Christ. Let them devastate Satan’s reign. Let them pasture the sheep, kill the wolves, instruct and exhort the rebellious. Let them bind and loose, thunder and lightning, if necessary, but let them do all according to the word of God.”[3]

Calvin's expository discipline should prompt self-examination for all pastors. Have we grown lazy in our study habits? How much time do we spend in sermon preparation each week? Do we give sufficient care to right handling the word of truth (2 Tim. 2:15)? When we evaluate our sermons from the last year, can we honestly say that we have not shrunk away from declaring the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27)? How might Calvin's example shape our preaching agendas for the next year?

Notes

[1] Quoted in James Stitzinger, “The History of Expository Preaching,” John MacArthur Jr. and the Master’s Seminary Faculty, Richard L. Mayhue, Editor, Rediscovering Expository Preaching (Dallas, TX: Word Publishing, 1992) 50.


[2] See John Piper, The Legacy of Sovereign Joy: God’s Triumphant Grace in the Lives of Augustine, Luther, and Calvin (Wheaton: Crossway Books, 2000). Piper’s essay on Calvin will provide an excellent introduction to and overview of Calvin’s life and ministry for those interested.


[3] John Calvin, Sermons on Ephesians (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth Trust, 1973) xii.

"Everything good in us is the fruit of his grace" - John Calvin on the Holy Spirit

Here it will be proper to point out the titles which the Scripture bestows on the Spirit, when it treats of the commencement and entire renewal of our salvation. First, he is called the “Spirit of adoption,” because he is witness to us of the free favor with which God the Father embraced us in his well-beloved and only-begotten Son, so as to become our Fathers and give us boldness of access to him; nays he dictates the very words, so that we can boldly cry, “Abba, Father.” Rom. 8:15; Gal. 4:6

For the same reason, he is said to have “sealed us, and given the earnest of the Spirit in our hearts,” because, as pilgrims in the world, and persons in a manner dead, he so quickens us from above as to assure us that our salvation is safe in the keeping of a faithful God. 2 Cor. 1:22; Eph. 1:13, 14

Hence, also, the Spirit is said to be “life because of righteousness.” But since it is his secret irrigation that makes us bud forth and produce the fruits of righteousness, he is repeatedly described as water. Thus in Isaiah “Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters.” Again, “I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground.” Corresponding to this are the words of our Savior, to which I lately referred, “If any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink.” Sometimes, indeed, he receives this name from his energy in cleansing and purifying, as in Ezekiel, where the Lord promises, “Then will I sprinkle you with clean water, and ye shall be clean.”
Rom. 8:10; Isa. 55:1; 44:3; John 7:37; Ezek. 36:25

As those sprinkled with the Spirit are restored to the full vigor of life, he hence obtains the names of “Oil” and “Unction.”
John 2:14; 1 John 2:20, 27 On the other hand, as he is constantly employed in subduing and destroying the vices of our concupiscence, and inflaming our hearts with the love of God and piety, he hence receives the name of Fire. Luke 3:16; Acts 11:21

In fine, he is described to us as a Fountain, whence all heavenly riches flow to us; or as the Hand by which God exerts his power, because by his divine inspiration he so breathes divine life into us, that we are no longer acted upon by ourselves, but ruled by his motion and agency, so that everything good in us is the fruit of his grace, while our own endowments without him are mere darkness of mind and perverseness of heart.

Already, indeed, it has been clearly shown, that until our minds are intent on the Spirit, Christ is in a manner unemployed, because we view him coldly without us, and so at a distance from us. Now we know that he is of no avail save only to those to whom he is a head and the first-born among the brethren, to those, in fine, who are clothed with him. To this union alone it is owing that, in regard to us, the Savior has not come in vain. To this is to be referred that sacred marriage, by which we become bone of his bone, and flesh of his flesh, and so one with him (Eph. 5:30), for it is by the Spirit alone that he unites himself to us. By the same grace and energy of the Spirit we become his members, so that he keeps us under him, and we in our turn possess him.

John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book III, Chapter 1, Section 3
(Emphasis and paragraph breaks added)

Soli Deo Gloria: Gratitude for the Reformation

Today is the four hundred and ninety-third anniversary of the Protestant Reformation. On October 31, 1517, a young German theology professor named Martin Luther nailed his famous Ninety-Five Theses to the wooden door of the Wittenburg Castle church. Little did he know that this would spark a movement which would change the face of church (and even world) history, forever.

In fact, R. C. Sproul tells us that “Luther’s posting of such theses was not a radical act, nor did it desecrate the church’s door. Announcements were posted there routinely, making it a sort of community bulletin board. It was customary for the university faculty to hold discussions of theological import, and these discussions were announced in this manner. Luther penned the theses, not in the German vernacular, but in Latin. This vindicates Luther’s later claim that he originally intended to offer the theses for theological discussion, not to create a public uproar.”[i]

It is true that Luther’s contentions with the Roman Catholic Church were serious. The Roman church had corrupted the pure gospel of Christ by claiming that observing the sacraments was essential to a person’s justification before God. Baptism conveyed the initial grace of justification which could be lost by committing a mortal sin. The sacrament of penance was the second plank of justification, in that it would restore grace for those who had shipwrecked their souls through sin. Connected to the sacrament of penance was the sale of indulgences. People were told that they could save relatives from thousands of years of suffering in purgatory, not to mention deliver their own souls, if they would give alms according to the dictates of their priest. Such perversions of God’s word (and there were many more) moved Luther to pen his famous theses, one of which said, “They preach human folly who pretend that as soon as money in the coffer rings, a soul from purgatory springs.”[ii]

But though Luther’s words were sharp, one biographer described him as “a man climbing in the darkness a winding staircase in the steeple of an ancient cathedral. In the blackness he reached out to steady himself, and his hand laid hold of a rope. He was startled to hear the clanging of a bell.”[iii] And did the bell ring! Within only weeks, Luther’s Ninety-Five Theses were known throughout Germany, and the Reformation had begun.

While I don’t affirm everything that Luther or the other Reformers taught, I am very thankful for their courageous and faithful heralding of the pure gospel of Christ as expressed in the five sola’s: Sola Scriptura, Sola Gratia, Sola Fide, Solos Christos, and Soli Deo Gloria.

Sola Scriptura (Scripture Alone)

Fundamental to the teaching of the Reformers was the Word of God. Sola Scriptura began to hold sway over and against the Roman Catholic teaching which gave authority to church and tradition that was equivalent (and even superior) to the Bible. The Reformers believed that the Bible was God’s Word, inspired by God’s Spirit, and thus fully accurate and authoritative. The results of this conviction were history-shaping. Possessed by a holy fear of God and reverence for His Word, the Reformers set themselves to master the original languages of Greek and Hebrew.

The undo allegorical (as opposed to literal) interpretation of the Bible which was common to Rome was curtailed, and a new era of expository preaching began. John Calvin especially left a legacy of Biblical preaching that few (if any) men since has rivaled. For example, he began preaching through the book of Acts on August 25, 1549, and ended in March of 1554 – nearly five years later! He preached 46 sermons on the Thessalonian letters, 186 on the Corinthians, 86 on the Pastorals, 43 on Galatians, 48 on Ephesians, 159 on Job, 200 on Deuteronomy, 123 on Genesis, and 353 on Isaiah! His sermons and commentaries are still being read today by preachers and scholars alike.

Of course, the greatest and most enduring effect of the Reformer’s Sola Scriptura conviction was their fervent labor in getting the Word of God into the language of the masses – for “how could the public acquire a knowledge of the truth, asked William Tyndale, ‘except ye scripture were playnly layd before their eyes in their mother tonge?’”[iv] In large measure, we owe our access to the Bible in our language today, to the faithful labors of such men.

Sola Gratia (Grace Alone)

In stark contrast to the works-based doctrine of salvation taught by the Roman Catholic Church, the Reformers believed that sinners are saved by grace alone. Calvin’s Institutes of the Christian Religion explicitly taught this grace-oriented theology, reaching back to Augustine, and ultimately to the Scriptures. Perhaps no passage better expresses this conviction than Paul’s familiar words from Ephesians 2:8-10: “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” (ESV)

Sola Fide (Faith Alone) and Solos Christos (Christ Alone)

Akin to Sola Gratia, was Sola Fide, which emphasized that justification was through faith alone in Christ alone (Solos Christos, the fourth sola). Luther described this as “articulus stantis vel cadentis ecclesiae - the article with and by which the church stands, without which it falls.”

We receive justification from God by faith alone. “For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law” (Rom. 3:28). “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Rom. 5:1). This joyful declaration is the summary of Paul’s argument in Romans 3 and 4. One of the key paragraphs reads, "But now the righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law, although the Law and the Prophets bear witness to it – the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe. For there is no distinction: for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, whom God put forward as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith. This was to show God’s righteousness, because in his divine forbearance he had passed over former sins. It was to show his righteousness at the present time, so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus" (Rom. 3:21-26).

Having established that all men are sinners (v. 23), Paul points to the cross as the solution to the mess sin created. God displayed his crucified Son before the world as an exhibition of his righteousness (v. 25). His wrath against sin was poured out on Jesus and satisfied. God justifies us on the basis of Christ’s life and death for us through faith alone.

Through the work of Christ, God’s glory has been vindicated. His honor has been upheld. His righteousness has been displayed. The debt of sin has been paid. This is the meaning of the cross. And all this is received by faith. Paul describes “the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe,” and says that God has put Christ forward “as a propitiation by his blood, to be received by faith.” This was to declare God’s righteousness “so that he might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus” (vv. 21, 25, 26).

Faith is believing in and relying upon God. It is “not a work, but a relinquishment of all work, an unqualified trust in God who gives life to the dead (4:17), who raised Christ from the dead (4:24), who in Christ gave ‘a righteousness from God.’”[v]

Justification is by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. God accepts us as righteous not because of anything we do, and not even because of anything he has done in us, but solely because of what Jesus Christ has done for us.

Soli Deo Gloria (Glory to God Alone)

The final sola is the great underlying reason behind the importance of the first four. The Reformers knew the Biblical truth that: “from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen” (Rom. 11:36, ESV). They were held captive by a passion for God’s glory, and a conviction that He Himself would “not give [His] glory to another” (Isa. 48:11). And they knew that to depart from the Word of God and compromise the gospel of salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, was to cast contempt on God’s glory. John Calvin, writing to the Catholic Cardinal Sadolet, thus said: “You . . . touch upon justification by faith, the first and keenest subject of controversy between us . . . . Wherever the knowledge of it is taken away, the glory of Christ is extinguished.”[vi] Oh, that we had such concern for the glory of our Savior!

My prayer is that this brief remembrance of the Reformers and the great truths they preached will stir within your heart a passion to faithfully spread this glorious gospel of salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone. We need a host of Luther-like men today - and a host of churches to stand behind them in their proclamation of the gospel. Were the Reformers perfect? No. Did they have some obvious faults? Yes. But considering the time in which they lived and the darkness from which they were delivered, they were very great men.

When Luther stood before the Imperial Diet of Worms in 1521, and was asked to recant his books and repudiate the “errors” they contained, he uttered these famous words: “Since then Your Majesty and your lordships desire a simple reply, I will answer without horns and without teeth. Unless I am convicted by Scripture and plain reason­­ – I do not accept the authority of popes and councils, for they have contradicted each other – my conscience is captive to the Word of God. I cannot and I will not recant anything, for to go against conscience is neither right nor safe . . . Here I stand, I cannot do otherwise . . . God help me. Amen.”[vii]

Notes

[i]R. C. Sproul, Faith Alone: The Evangelical Doctrine of Justification (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1995), 60

[ii]Ibid, 61

[iii]Roland Bainton, quoted by R. C. Sproul, The Holiness of God (Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, 1987), 108

[iv]New Dictionary of Theology (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1988), 565

[v] Herman Bavinck, with the Greek words omitted, in Herman Bavinck, John Bolt, gen. ed., John Vriend, trans., Reformed Dogmatics: Volume 4: Holy Spirit, Church, and New Creation (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2008) 211.

[vi]Quoted by John Piper, “The Divine Majesty of the Word: John Calvin: The Man and His Preaching” (Minneapolis: Desiring God Ministries, 1997).

[vii]Roland Bainton, Here I Stand: A Life of Martin Luther (New York: New American Library, 1950), 144

Calvin and Chrysostom on Confessing Our Sins

Does a believer have to confess his or her sins to another believer in order to obtain forgiveness? Most evangelicals would say no, but sometimes I wonder if our practices say otherwise. With the recent resurgence of interest in ancient practices of spirituality, confession to a priest is becoming more common, even among non-Catholics. Or consider accountability partnerships: while these can be healthy and helpful, there is also a subtle danger that a believer will feel bound in conscience to confess to his or her accountability partner.

Those who promote this kind of confession would quote James 5:16, “Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed,” and argue that it is psychologically important for us to disclose our sins to a human being – that something will be lacking in our experience (if not the fact) of forgiveness if we do not. They would further argue that our brothers and sisters in Christ can powerfully represent Christ to us – so that in confessing our sins and in hearing an assurance of pardon from them, the grace of Christ is audibly and visibly represented to us. For example, Dietrich Bonhoeffer (whose writings, incidentally, I love!) says,

“Christ became our Brother in the flesh in order that we might believe in Him. . . . Now our brother stands in Christ’s stead. Before him I need no longer dissemble. Before him alone in the whole world I dare to be the sinner I am. . . . Christ became our Brother to help us. Through him our brother has become Christ for us in the power and authority of the commission Christ has given to him. . . . When I go to my brother to confess, I am going to God.”[1]

While I understand the arguments, I’m concerned that this way of thinking quietly undermines the gospel. When I ran across these arguments in some recent reading, I started wondering how the Reformers handled the issue of auricular confession. So, I pulled Calvin’s Institutes off my shelf. And I’m glad I did.

Calvin argued strongly against the Catholic insistence that believers were duty-bound to confess their sins to a priest in order to receive the grace of forgiveness. He noted that “all priestly offices have been transferred to Christ and are fulfilled and completed in him,”[2] and passionately contended that confessing our sins to God alone is sufficient for obtaining forgiveness:

Since it is the Lord who forgives, forgets, and wipes out sins, let us confess our sins to him in order to obtain pardon. He is the physician; therefore, let us lay bare our wounds to him. It is he who is hurt and offended; from him let us seek peace. He is the discerner of hearts, the one cognizant of all thoughts [cf. Heb. 4:12]; let us hasten to pour out our hearts before him. He it is, finally, who calls sinners: let us not delay to come to God himself.[3]

Most moving to me were Calvin’s quotations attributed to Chrysostom[4]:

“Tell your sins,” he says, “that you may wipe them away. If you are embarrassed to tell anyone what sins you have committed, recite them daily to your own soul. I do not tell you to confess them to your fellow servant, who may upbraid you. Recite them to God who heals them. Confess your sins upon your bed that there your conscience may daily acknowledge its misdeeds.”

Again: “Now, morever, it is not necessary to confess in the presence of witnesses. Examine your sins in your own thought. Let this judgment be without witness: let God alone see you confessing.”

Again: “I do not lead you onto the stage before your fellow servants. I do not compel you to uncover your sins to men. Betake your conscience to God’s presence and lay it open before him. Show your wounds to the Lord, the most excellent physician, and seek remedy from him. Show them to him, who does not reproach but most gently heals.”

Again: “Surely, you should tell no man, lest he upbraid you; for you should confess nothing to a fellow servant, who may make it public. But show your wounds to the Lord, who takes care of you and is your kind physician.” Afterward he has God say, “I do not compel you to come on mid-stage before many witnesses. Tell your sin privately to me only that I may heal your sore.”[5]

Calvin did agree that James 4:16 enjoins us to “lay our infirmities on one another’s breasts, to receive among ourselves mutual counsel, mutual compassion, and mutual consolation.”[6] In fact, he acknowledges several reasons why confession to human beings might be necessary or helpful. First, we do need to publicly acknowledge, in a general way, that we are sinners. Second, sometimes we need to confess our sins for the removal of an offense and the reconciliation of a relationship (as in Matthew 5:23-24 and 2 Corinthians 2:6-7). And third, there are times when we should privately confess sins to a pastor in cases where we are “troubled and afflicted with a sense of sins, so that without outside help [we are] unable to free [ourselves] from them.”

But with this last form of confession, Calvin urged that we should always observe this rule:

that where God prescribes nothing definite, consciences be not bound with a definite yoke. Hence, it follows that confession of this sort ought to be free so as not to be required of all, but to be commended only to those who know they have need of it. Then, that those who use it according to their need neither be forced by any rule nor be induced by any trick to recount all their sins. But let them do this so far as they consider it expedient, that they may receive the perfect fruit of consolation.[7]

Calvin’s teaching strikes me as both balanced and biblical. Of course there are occasions when confession is necessary for repairing a broken relationship or acknowledging a public offense. And sometimes it may be uniquely helpful for us to confess our sins to a fellow-believer. But we should beware of falling into the trap of thinking it is necessary as a means of obtaining God’s assurance of pardon. Christ is our great high priest, who invites us to come to the throne of grace with confidence that we will be heard (Heb 4:14-16). He has appeared once and for all to take away our sins (Heb. 9:26, 28). His blood alone can purify a sinner’s conscience (Heb. 9:14). This doesn’t mean we should be soft on sin. But it does remind us where our true hope for forgiveness and assurance lies. Not in the words of a confessor or a well-intended accountability partner – but in Christ alone.

Notes

[1] Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Life Together, trans. John W. Doberstein (San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1993) 111-112.

[2] John Calvin, John T. McNeil, ed., Ford L. Battles, trans., Institutes of the Christian Religion (Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press, 1960) 627.

[3] Ibid., 634.

[4] The editor, however, indicates that only the last two quotations actually come from Chrysostom.

[5] Ibid., 632-33.

[6] Ibid., 630.

[7] Ibid., 637.

The Great "Johns" of the Faith (Part 1): Calvin

This is the first in a series of posts I plan to write called "The Great 'Johns' of the Faith." I got the initial idea from a lecture by Sinclair Ferguson. Ferguson alluded to how he had benefited from the great Johns of the church - Calvin, Owen, Duncan, and Murray. My list includes some of the same names, but also some different ones.

Over the past year I've somewhat refocused my reading and study back on to older writers. I've been enriched in my own spiritual life - as well as my understanding of Scripture and grasp of Christian doctrine. So, the reason for these posts is to pay tribute to these men who have blessed me, to articulate some of the ways that I've benefited from their writings, to thank God for them, and to encourage you to choose an old author for some of your reading next year.

So, here's part one. John Calvin.

I've been reading through Calvin's Institutes of the Christian Religion. It is a massive book and I'm only a bit past the half way mark! I also dip into Calvin's commentaries occasionally and have skimmed a few sermons. That's the extent of my knowledge of Calvin. So this is certainly not coming from an expert or Calvin scholar. But I've benefited from what I've read and here's how.

The Institutes of the Christian Religion is a masterfully written systematic summary and defense of the basic tenets of Christianity. I would describe it with four phrases. It is exegetical in substance, Christ-centered in focus, worshipful in tone, and polemical in style.

Exegetical in substance

Calvin has been called the "father of modern exegesis" and rightly so. He pioneered the literal-historical-grammatical method of exegesis. This is especially true of his excellent commentaries, but also reflected in the Institutes. The final court of appeal for Calvin is Scripture. His arguments are laced with quotations from the Bible and one senses that Calvin was very hesitant to go further than Scripture in his surmizings.

Christ-centered in focus 

This has really struck me in my reading Calvin (I'm now in volume 2 of this edition). Calvin's Christology was robust and it pervades virtually every page of the Institutes. This is especially true in Book III, on the way in which we receive the grace of Christ, which is especially rich. This is where Calvin's teaching on justification, sanctification and union with Christ are found, as well as his more practical teaching on the Christian life.

Worshipful in tone 

Despite what some people may think, Calvin is not a dry theologian. Some Calvinists could benefit from soaking in their fore-father - perhaps picking up some of his reverence and humility. Seriously, this book lifts my gaze to God. That's good enough reason to recommend it.

Polemical in style 

Along with everything above, Calvin was a polemicist, no doubt about it. This book is saucy! Calvin didn't hesitate to call his adversaries by name AND call them names. That may seem harsh to modern readers and leave a sour taste in some mouths. But even Jesus could call the Pharisees vipers and Calvin doesn't stray too far from his master in this regard. We should also remember the turbulent times in which Calvin wrote. He says in his preface that one of the reasons he wrote the Institutes was to make clear what young French pastors who were being martyred were dying for. Remember that his friends were being killed for their convictions before getting too critical of Calvin's language. But the polemics in Calvin show up most in his interaction with the dogma of medieval Roman Catholicism. Calvin takes on the exegesis of Aquinas and others and tears it to shreds. I've learned a fair bit about Roman Catholicism in reading Calvin.

This edition (see on the right) is probably the best available with helpful notes and an excellent team of scholars under J. T. McNeil behind the text. Calvin's quotations are documented and the text is keyed with symbols showing the development of the Institutes from its initial version in 1536 through its five reprints (the final in 1559). An excellent read for anyone interested in Reformed theology, historical theology, systematic theology or . . . just theology!

For a short biographical sketch of Calvin, try reading (or listening to) John Piper's The Divine Majesty of the Word: John Calvin: The Man and His Preaching.